Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
| 2 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | |
| 3 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 3 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 6 | LU Ian | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 7 | DAI Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 8 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 1% | |
| 9 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | XUE Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
| 12 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 14 | LEE Jaehee | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | MANA Sameer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 16 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 2% | |
| 17 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 18 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 19 | SONG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 11% |
| 21 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 22 | DING Max | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 23 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 27 | DU Evan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 28 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | JU Shang | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 34 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 35 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | MA kevin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
| 37 | LO Stefan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 38 | LI Stephen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 39 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | CHAN Calvin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DARJI Dev | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SUN Jiarui | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | MA Weichu | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | CHAN Nathan | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | MATUSOW Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 51 | MANIK Nirvaan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | ZHANG William | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | CHANG Ryan | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | HO Bennett | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | POST Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 57 | YANG Rony | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.