Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TRULL A.J. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
2 | XIAO Hanzhi (Shawn) | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | LAI Boden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | PALIWODA Nicholas | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
5 | BRODSKY Julian | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | SONG Troy | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
7 | LIU Jeremiah W. | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
8 | FENG shang | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
9 | FEINBERG James Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
10 | X Benjamin | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
12 | CHAI Ethan | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
13 | JIANG Matthew | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | CHOU Benson | V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
15 | SANTOS Antonio K. | V V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
16 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
17 | SCHAUER Oliver | V V V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
18 | JIANG ryan | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
19 | XIE Brandon | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | ZENG Andrew | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
21 | DOUBOV Andrew | D D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
22 | LI Ray | D D V V V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
23 | BRADSHAW Carter | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
24 | XIA Dashan | D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
25 | WARD Kofi | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
26 | BYRON Max | V D V V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
27 | SINGLETON Aman | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
28 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | D D V V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
29 | PAN Anthony | D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
30 | HSIEN Hong-yu | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
31 | LIU Adam | D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
32 | GLUSHKOV David | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
33 | MASSE Jack | V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
34 | BAJAJ Nakul | V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
35 | SANTOS Francisco M. | D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
36 | WUNDER Eli | D V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
37 | ZHAO Pierce | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
38 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | V V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
39 | BARROSO Jose | D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
40 | CAFASSO Alexander | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
41 | TESFAYE Elias | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | LISANKE Victor | V D D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
43 | WOLFORD Benjamin | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
44 | LI Jade | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
44 | KNOX Mekhi | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
46 | AHMED Mohsen | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
47 | LEE Ethan | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
48 | HANNA Alexander | D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
49 | FINNEY Mason | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
50 | CANAPARI Theodore | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
51 | ROSIELLO Francesco | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | WILLIAMS Asher | D V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
53 | LIU Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
54 | HALL Miles | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
55 | MASSE Dean | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
56 | HALL Noah | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
57 | ULINTZ MOSOVICH Quinn | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.