Pasadena City College - Pasadena, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | FAN Beichen | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 3 | CHIEN Brandon | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 5 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | ZHENG Haoran | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 7 | MA Victor | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 9 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | EVERS Gabriel | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | PHUKAN Rohin | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | CHIEN Zachary M. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | HEPLER Sarah | D V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 14 | PAK Elliot | V D D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | PAINTER Noah | V D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 18 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | HEWITT Frank F. | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | ALEXANDER Chuck | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 20 | PHEN Justin P. | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | D V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 23 | AU Marcus J. | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | JENSEN David | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | SCHROEDER Dylan | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | LOCASALE Nicholas | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | RODOCANACHI Jean | V D V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 28 | DEMPSEY Connor | D V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | TEMPLEHOF Robert C. | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | BAXTER David | V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 31 | MENDOZA Zandro | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | CAMPOS Jesus | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 33 | FERRIERE Joshua | V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 34 | JU Hanul | V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | PEÑA Ethan | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 37 | NALBANDIAN Vahan P. | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 38 | STAFFORD Bryan | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 39 | FERRIERE Thomas | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | MESERVE Max | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 41 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 42 | BAXTER Max | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 43 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 44 | SOLONOVICH Maksim | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | NAZARIAN Jonah | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 46 | REID James | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 48 | STAFFORD Michael | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 49 | PAK Tina | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 50 | BARBARA patrick | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.