Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
2 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
3 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 21% |
3 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | |
5 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
6 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
7 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | |
8 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
9 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
10 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
11 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
12 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
13 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 5% |
14 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
15 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
16 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
17 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
18 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
19 | HU Robin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
20 | WU Wesley E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
21 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
22 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
23 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
24 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
25 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
26 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
27 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 4% |
30 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
32 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
33 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
36 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
37 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
38 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
39 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | 7% |
40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
41 | GORDON Sasha | 100% | 59% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
43 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
44 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
46 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 82% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | ZHONG Guoren | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
48 | LEE Aidan K. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
49 | FURST Matthew C. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
50 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
51 | PICARD Justin | 100% | 64% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
52 | GUPTA Varun | 100% | 81% | 36% | 5% | - | - | |
53 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.