The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 2 | MA Andrew | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 3 | MYERS Dean | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 45% | |
| 3 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 5 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 6 | AGRAWAL Niki | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 8 | SMITH Grant D. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | SETLUR Bhrugu | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 26% | |
| 10 | EDISON Ansel | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 24% | 3% | |
| 11 | PARK Rion | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 13 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 14 | WU Lucas | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% | |
| 15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% |
| 16 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 3% | 24% | 50% | 23% | |
| 17 | PARK Sky | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 18 | DERRICK Blake | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 19 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 17% |
| 20 | LO Preston | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 21 | TUAN Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 22 | REICHEL Ezra | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 23 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZHOU Ryan | - | 5% | 41% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | KIM Daniel Y. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 26 | GETSIN Anthony | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | |
| 27 | LAM Nicolas | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | WONG Evan | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | BAEK David | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 30 | CHAN Connor | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 31 | TEH Ryan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 32 | LIU Andrew | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 33 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 35 | KIM Jonah | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SAH Steven | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 2% | 25% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
| 39 | ZHANG Graham | 4% | 26% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | KROVIDI Arush | 3% | 35% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | JIANG Yehong | 14% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | HE Bourne | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | LUI Justin | 30% | 58% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | NG Andrew | 12% | 41% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | PETERSON Lucas | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | NGAI Julian | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | LEHTINEN Axel | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 2% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | LIANG Ethan | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | COONAN Seamus | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | GORDON William L. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | AUYEUNG Isaac | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | PETROV Mikhail | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BOYNTON Alex | 60% | 38% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | WILLEY Emerson | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | GUPTA Tarush | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.