The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 2 | LIN ariel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 3 | CAMAMA Tessa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 6 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 7 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 9 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 12 | SAID Riana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 13 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 15 | XU Celina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 17 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 20 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 22 | TSE Harmony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 23 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 24 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | COHEN Shaina | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | YIN Gabriela | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | MYERS Cal | 100% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
| 31 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | POON Desiree | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | DAVIS Violet | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | LEE Valerie | 100% | 96% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | MU Kelsey | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | BANERJEE Eesha | 100% | 80% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | CHEN Samantha | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MAGYARI-KOPE Ingrid | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | JAIN Aashi | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.