The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SISINNI Riccardo | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | MA Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | WANG Ethan | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
3 | DETERING Julian | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
5 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
6 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
7 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
8 | TUAN Evan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
9 | LING Eddie | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
10 | MORROW Brenden | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
11 | LI Jett | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
12 | PARK Sky | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
13 | LI Matthew | V D V V V D | V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
14 | SMITH Grant D. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
16 | LO Preston | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
17 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | D V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
18 | MYERS Dean | V V V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
19 | PINCHENG Yao | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | ANDERSON Jacob | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
21 | NG Kenneth | D V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
22 | LAM Nicolas | D V V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
23 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
24 | NICOLETTI Luca | V V D D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
25 | WU Lucas | D D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
26 | HARRIS Otto | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
27 | BAEK David | V V D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
28 | SAH Steven | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
29 | KIM Daniel Y. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
30 | TONKOVICH Ryan | V D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
31 | REICHEL Ezra | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | PARK Rion | D V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | LIU William | V D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
33 | WONG Evan | V D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
35 | NGAI Julian | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
36 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
37 | LIU Felix | V D V D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
38 | TEH Ryan | V V D D D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
39 | KIM Jonah | D D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
40 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
41 | BOUCHARD Kai | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
42 | YEE Johnathan | V D D D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
43 | PETERSON Lucas | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
44 | GORDON William L. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
45 | KALAMAS Nikolas | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
46 | EDISON Ansel | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
46 | JIANG Yehong | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
46 | LUI Justin | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
49 | ZHANG Graham | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
50 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
51 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
52 | CHAN Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
53 | LEHTINEN Axel | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
54 | LIANG Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
55 | BOYNTON Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
56 | COONAN Seamus | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.