The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | MA Andrew | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | WANG Ethan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 3 | DETERING Julian | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 5 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
| 6 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 7 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 19% |
| 8 | TUAN Evan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 9 | LING Eddie | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 10 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 11 | LI Jett | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | PARK Sky | - | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | LI Matthew | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 14 | SMITH Grant D. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | LO Preston | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 18 | MYERS Dean | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 19 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | ANDERSON Jacob | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 21 | NG Kenneth | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 22 | LAM Nicolas | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 25 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | HARRIS Otto | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 27 | BAEK David | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 28 | SAH Steven | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KIM Daniel Y. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | REICHEL Ezra | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | PARK Rion | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 33 | LIU William | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WONG Evan | - | 8% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | NGAI Julian | - | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 37 | LIU Felix | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 38 | TEH Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 39 | KIM Jonah | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | AGRAWAL Niki | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | BOUCHARD Kai | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | YEE Johnathan | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 43 | PETERSON Lucas | 16% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 44 | GORDON William L. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 4% | 32% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | EDISON Ansel | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | JIANG Yehong | 9% | 43% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LUI Justin | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Graham | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 4% | 50% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CHAN Connor | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LEHTINEN Axel | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LIANG Ethan | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BOYNTON Alex | 90% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | COONAN Seamus | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.