Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
| 3 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | LUTAR Lucas N. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 5 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 6 | RECHLER Logan | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | TAQI Ahmad F. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 8 | BAE Anthony | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 42% | |
| 9 | LIU Patrick | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 10 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 11 | POLANSKY Solomon | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% | |
| 13 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 44% | 33% | 5% |
| 14 | LIU Eric P. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | LOPEZ Carlos D. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | HUTH Jacob | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | HUTH Mitchell | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 19 | SLEDESKI Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 20 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 21 | ROUNTREE Rob | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | WALTER Evran M. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | BADRIGIAN William H. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | TOLENTINO Francis Jr B. | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | CHEN-LI David C. | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | LI Edward | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | TORO Alejandro | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | SHI Shenzhi | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LI Yulei | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | LABROZZI Aidan | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LE Vyn A. | 5% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 36 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | GU Jeffrey | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | IYENGAR Amal N. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | XIAO Anthony | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | KIM Kevin | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | STURGIS Zachary C. | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | MALARSKI Daniel | 21% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.