Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PRILUTSKY David B. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | LUTAR Lucas N. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 5 | RITCHIE Luke W. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | RECHLER Logan | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | TAQI Ahmad F. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | BAE Anthony | V V D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 9 | LIU Patrick | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | BRATTON Jack S. | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | POLANSKY Solomon | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | LIU Eric P. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | LOPEZ Carlos D. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | HUTH Jacob | V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | HUTH Mitchell | V V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 18 | DIVENTI Paul W. | D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | SLEDESKI Andrew | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | ROUNTREE Rob | D V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 22 | WALTER Evran M. | V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 23 | SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. | V V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | BADRIGIAN William H. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | TOLENTINO Francis Jr B. | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | CHEN-LI David C. | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | LI Edward | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | TORO Alejandro | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | SHI Shenzhi | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | LI Yulei | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | LABROZZI Aidan | V D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | LE Vyn A. | D V D V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 34 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | V D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 37 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | GU Jeffrey | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 39 | IYENGAR Amal N. | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 40 | ALONSOZANA Luke | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 41 | XIAO Anthony | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 43 | STURGIS Zachary C. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 44 | MALARSKI Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.