Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
2 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
3 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
3 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
5 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
6 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
7 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
8 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
9 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
10 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | < 1% |
11 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | ||
12 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
13 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
14 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
15 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
16 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
17 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
17 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
19 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
20 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
21 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
22 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
22 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
24 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | |
25 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
26 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
27 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
28 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% | |
29 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 4% |
30 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
31 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
32 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | ||
33 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
34 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | < 1% | - |
35 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
36 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
37 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
38 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
39 | LU Elaine | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
40 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
41 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
42 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | |
42 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% | |
44 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
45 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
46 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
47 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
48 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
49 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
50 | LU Amy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
51 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | |
52 | XI Shining | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | |
53 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
54 | WU Helen | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
55 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
56 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
57 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | |
58 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
59 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
60 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
61 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | ||
62 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
63 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
64 | XIAO julie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
65 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
66 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
67 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
68 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
69 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
70 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
71 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | |
72 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
73 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
74 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
75 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
76 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | ||
77 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
78 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
79 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
80 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
81 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
81 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
83 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
84 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
85 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
86 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
87 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
88 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
88 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
90 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
91 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
92 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
93 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
94 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
95 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
96 | YANG Lea | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
97 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
97 | ELSHAKANKIRI Janna | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
99 | ZHOU Jacquelyn K. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | ||
101 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
102 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
103 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
104 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
105 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
106 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
107 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
108 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
109 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
110 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
111 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
112 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
113 | SADIK HANA | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
114 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
115 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
116 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
117 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
118 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
119 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
119 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
121 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
121 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
123 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
124 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
125 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
126 | LIU Zhi Jun | 100% | 86% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | |
127 | KALISOVA Kristyna | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
127 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.