Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SARON Mitchell S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
2 | SMITH Jared C. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
3 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
3 | ELSISSY Ziad A. | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
5 | HEATHCOCK Antonio | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
6 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
7 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
8 | LEE Justin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
9 | ARMIJO Gabriel K. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
10 | YEN Darren | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
11 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
12 | MORRILL William | - | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
13 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
14 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
15 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | - | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 23% | 76% |
16 | ZU Kevin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
17 | MAROUF Eyad | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 62% | 12% |
18 | LIANG Connor | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
19 | GUZZO Vito | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
21 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
22 | COSTIN Michael V. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
23 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - |
24 | WOODWARD Connor | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
25 | YUN Jaesun | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
26 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
27 | SO Hananiah | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
28 | KOGAN Benjamin | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
29 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 6% |
30 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
31 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
32 | YANG Ziyi | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
33 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
34 | WALKER Dalton F. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
35 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
36 | BOOTH Zaheer | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
37 | REN Junming | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
38 | WANG Charles | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
40 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
41 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
42 | ROBERTS Sam | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
43 | NOBLE Colin | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
44 | WOOD Elden S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% | |
45 | BERRIO Carter E. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
46 | BARNETT Adam | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
47 | KIM Shawn J. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
48 | DENG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
49 | JIANG Anthony | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
50 | LE Hayden | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
51 | REN James | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
52 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
53 | LO Konnor | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
54 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
55 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
56 | DOLAN Charles R. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
57 | XU William | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | - |
58 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
59 | WITEK Bernard J. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
60 | WANG Eric Y. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | - |
61 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | PANDEY Neil | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
63 | KOLASA Thomas M. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
64 | GLOZMAN Justin | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
65 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
66 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
67 | MICLAUS Justin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
68 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
69 | TANN Justin | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% | |
70 | TE VELDE Noah C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
71 | LI Minghan | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
72 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - |
73 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
74 | NOBLE Daniel | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
75 | LILOV Neil | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
76 | BULL Anderson | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
77 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
78 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% |
79 | HONG Rubin | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
80 | DIACOS Jordan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
81 | ZHU Charlie | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
82 | KOTOV Leonid | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
82 | DESROSIERS Olivier | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% | |
84 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
85 | ZENG Noah | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
86 | FENG Leo | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
87 | TONG ZACHARY | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
88 | KIM Alexander M. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
89 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
90 | SHOMAN Zachary | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
91 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
92 | GHENEA George Philipe | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
93 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
94 | SWORDS Evan F. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
95 | HAN Daniel Y. | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
95 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
97 | GHAYALOD ansh | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
98 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 8% | - |
99 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
100 | LIM William J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
101 | HOLZ William A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
101 | WONG Ryan | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
103 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
103 | HONG Steven | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
105 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
106 | SCHERER Max | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
107 | MARGULIES William | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
108 | BONSELL Vance | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
109 | FALLICK Ozzie | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
110 | LUO George F. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
111 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% | - |
112 | FRIAS SAUL F. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
113 | OH Triton | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
114 | PAN Jerry | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
115 | CHIN Matthew W. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
116 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
117 | YUN Jake | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
118 | CADAMBI Roshan | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
119 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
120 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
120 | PAN Alex | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
120 | REN Richard | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
123 | ZHOU Miles | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
124 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
125 | SLASTIN Andrew | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
126 | CHOI Silas | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
127 | BEITEL Noah | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
128 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
129 | WANG Nicolas | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
130 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
130 | LEE Aydan J. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
132 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
133 | BAE Jason I. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
134 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
135 | XU Andrew | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
136 | HONG Vincent Q. | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
137 | GOLDIN Lucca | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
138 | PI Alexander | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
138 | GUAY-TARDIF Xavier | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
140 | PENG Bryan | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
141 | GANTA Vijay | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
142 | STONE Esmond A. | 15% | 41% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
143 | WANG Robert | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
144 | POPE Nico | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
145 | BARRETO Elliott | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
146 | WU Roger (Mengke) | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
147 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
148 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
149 | VO Minh Q. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
150 | CHEONG Heonjun | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
150 | QIU Nathan | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
152 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
153 | BURR Tanner B. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
154 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
155 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
156 | BOSITA Carson | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
157 | NG Jeremiah | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
158 | XU Luke | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
159 | HAN William | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
160 | PRIMUS Nazir | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
161 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
162 | SHOMAN Noah | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
163 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
164 | LIU kelly | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
165 | LEITH Jack | 38% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
166 | REYES Xavier M. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
167 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | 11% | 31% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.