Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | PINGEL Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 5% |
| 3 | TRAIN Timothy D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | SZEGO Levente (Levi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% |
| 5 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 6 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 7 | MOORE Guy L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | BADIOLI Carlo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 11 | GRENKE Brad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 12 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 14 | CORINALDI Greg | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | SNYDER John W. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GUMAGAY Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | 5% |
| 18 | LOGAN Mark P. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | SCHROEDER William | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 20 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | WIEDE Gerd | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LU Qi | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Shane C. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | WEIDMAN Jess | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | TATE Leon J. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | AKOCS Tony | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.