Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUZMAN Rafael (RJ) J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
2 | LIN William | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
3 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
3 | WANG Qifa | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
5 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
6 | GOLAS Brandon P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
7 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
8 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
9 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
10 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
11 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
12 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
13 | LOBO-BERG Gabriel (G) K. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
14 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
15 | BULANOV Alex Z. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
16 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
17 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
18 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
19 | GOSALIA Rishab | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
20 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
21 | WYCHE Scott H. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
22 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
23 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
24 | RONGET Gaspard | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
25 | VACCARI Braden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
26 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
27 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
28 | HUAYTA James W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
29 | LUO ZiRui | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
30 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
31 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
32 | XU Michael | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
33 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
34 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
35 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
36 | YEN Preston | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% | |
38 | CACERES Hernan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
40 | WU Nicholas R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
41 | WUN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
42 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
43 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
44 | TANG Albert | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
47 | KAHN Justin M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
48 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
49 | STEINMETZ John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
50 | STANLEY Hanno | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
51 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
53 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
56 | TREJO Oliver | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | CHEN Henry H. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
60 | REYES Kyle | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.