National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Division III Men’s Epee (DV3ME)

Saturday, July 5, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2410 2759 - 2191
5 - 8 1982 2018 - 1937
9 - 16 1821 2125 - 1589
17 - 23 1614 1800 - 1466

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Mathes, Caleb Northwest Fencing Center C25 2425 2043.14
2 Martin, Mason Medeo Fencing Club C25 2759 1962.81
3 Kofman, David Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) D25 2191 1851.72
4 Nabavi, Matthew North Shore Fencers Club D24 2267 1850.69
5 Rvachev, Michael Fencing Academy Of Westchester C25 2018 1718.85
6 Zankowski, Brendan High Desert Fencing Alliance D25 2015 1678.29
7 Sun, Lucas North Shore Fencers Club D24 1960 1652.64
8 Crespo, Nathaniel Justus Hills Fencing Institute D25 1937 1633.95
9 Moskowitz, Martin Seacoast Fencing Club D25 2016 1618.74
10 Kim, Remington LA International Fencing D25 1832 1578.79
11 Wu, Jerry New York Fencing Academy E24 2125 1553.23
12 Chakraborty, Zorian Salle Auriol Seattle D25 1824 1475.21
13 Leech, Braedan Nova Fencing Club D25 1729 1389.14
14 Rufanov, Maxim Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) D24 1842 1383.29
15 Guo, Luke Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 1610 1301.67
16 Li, Grayson Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 1589 1271.01
17 Springer, Elijah Sword In The Scroll Fencing Academy D24 1644 1250.26
18 Nolan, Tyler Apex Fencing Academy E24 1621 1183.90
19 Deng, Destin Yang Fencing Club U 1576 1159.50
20 Cohen, Joshua Battle Born Fencing Club D24 1551 877.90
21 Evans, Joseph Arena Fencing Academy LLC D25 1637 872.19
22 Dollarhite, Tommy Portland Fencing Center E24 1466 854.72
23 Varon, David Conejo Fencing Club U 1800 679.39

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!