LAIFC - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ITKIN Nick | V V V V | V V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | ZAPOZDAEV Igor | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | SADOVSKY Leor | V V V V | V V V | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 5 | LUH Ethan | V V V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 6 | KELLY William | V V D V V | V V | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 7 | TRAUGOT Owen | V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | YU Eric W | V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 9 | LOUIE Bryce | V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | NAYGAS lawrence | V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 11 | LYU Victor | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | MUSHER Benjamin | V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 13 | FOGELSON Frederick | V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 14 | OURSLER Jack | V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | CANLAS Nathan Edward | D D V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | FEDONCHIK Henry | V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | TRAUGOT Braden | V D V V | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 | |
| 19 | VAZQUEZ Zander | V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 20 | XU Jia Bao | D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 21 | SIU Aiden | D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | LOCKE Savannah | D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | GODZHIK Zachary | D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 24 | LE Jacob | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 26 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | D D V D V | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 27 | ZHEREBTSOV Kirill | V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | MARTIN IV Elmer Dean | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | MCCOSH Murray | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | PARK Rowan | D V D D | V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | WADHWANI Liana | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | YORK Lucas | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | KIM Brandon | V V D D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 34 | PADILLA Jacob | D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 35 | PARK Sky | D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 36 | KUZMAK Michael | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 38 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 39 | WASHINGTON Romeo | D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 40 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 41 | GOLDADE Luke | D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 42 | LIU Aaron Zixian | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 43 | COOK Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 44 | MISTRETTA Alex | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 45 | NA Rongtian | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.