New Orleans, LA - New ORleans, LA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 2 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | CLARK Timothy J. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | WELDON Benjamin | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | DAVIS Garrett | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 6 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | 4% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 7 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 8 | AMSBAUGH Travis M. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 10 | VAN BEEK Garrett | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | DAVIS Richard M. | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 12 | EGGERS Kurt | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 13 | KRAEMER Craig | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | SMITH Andrew | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | MA Bochen | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | DAVIS Campbell | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | JONES Ross | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | RAY William | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 19 | CHIZ Max H. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | SCHWARY Irv | 13% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | GUIDANGEN Jason | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.