New Orleans, LA - New ORleans, LA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 2 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | CLARK Timothy J. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 5 | DAVIS Garrett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 7 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 8 | AMSBAUGH Travis M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 10 | VAN BEEK Garrett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 11 | DAVIS Richard M. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 12 | EGGERS Kurt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 13 | KRAEMER Craig | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | SMITH Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | MA Bochen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | DAVIS Campbell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | JONES Ross | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | RAY William | 100% | 51% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 19 | CHIZ Max H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 87% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | GUIDANGEN Jason | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.