Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 2 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% |
| 3 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 5 | NORMILE Jon M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 6 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 7 | GATES Darcy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | 6% |
| 8 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 9 | EXUM Travis H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 10 | MEHALL Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 11 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 12 | KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% |
| 14 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 15 | KORSCHUN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 16 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | BUCKLEY Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 18 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | YAO Shun | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | CAMPBELL Alex | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | FOLEY Kevin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | BOLDUC PATRICE | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 32 | MAR Kevin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | GUMAGAY Paul | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | STEWART Robert | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | HUESKE David B. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ROOD Alex | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | DAVIS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CRAFT David M. | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | CISNEROS Robert A. | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | RIFKIND Neil | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.