Louisville, KY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KALKINA Yelena | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | DENNER Jasmina | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 5 | SIERRA Kate | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | RUNYAN Heidi | D V V V V D | V V V D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
| 8 | YANG Jenny J. | D D V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | KING Robin E. | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 10 | EYRE Jane E. | V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | DUNN Linda J. J. | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | ENOCHS Liz | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | DEMING Clare L. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | D V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | OBLONSKY Natalia | V V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | D D V D D | V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 17 | JOHNSON Laura S. | D V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | VANCE Beth S. | V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | CHIARELLI Elisabet | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | LUM Karen | D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | TURNER Delia M. | V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | WILSON Dawn J. | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | OISHI Yoko | D D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 26 | DAHL Naomi V. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 27 | WU Yik Chun | D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | DUDNICK Shannon | V D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 29 | SHAFER Genine | D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | MAUL Judy L. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | PREIMESBERGER Elaine | D V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | WEBB Maud | V D V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 34 | DEBERTIN Beth | D V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 35 | FOLEY Eileen | D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 36 | GLUCK Myriam | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | HILD Ranjani | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 39 | JOHNSON Pamela | V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 40 | PEIN Annette | V D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 41 | SCHLIENGER Katia | D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 42 | KIM Nam Heui | D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 43 | THORNTON Eva | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 44 | WALTER Joanne | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 45 | HIRSCH Lauren | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 46 | MARSH Lisa | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 46 | MUNGOVAN Elizabeth | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 48 | CONNOLLY Grace | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 49 | MORO Diana | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 50 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.