Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KALKINA Yelena | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 2 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
| 3 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | - | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 5 | SIERRA Kate | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 7 | RUNYAN Heidi | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 8 | YANG Jenny J. | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 9 | KING Robin E. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 10 | EYRE Jane E. | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
| 11 | DUNN Linda J. J. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 12 | ENOCHS Liz | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | |
| 13 | DEMING Clare L. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 5% |
| 14 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 15 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 16 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | JOHNSON Laura S. | - | - | - | 7% | 32% | 45% | 15% |
| 18 | VANCE Beth S. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
| 19 | CHIARELLI Elisabet | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 20 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LUM Karen | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 22 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 1% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | TURNER Delia M. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 24 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | 2% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 5% | |
| 25 | OISHI Yoko | 2% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | DAHL Naomi V. | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | WU Yik Chun | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | DUDNICK Shannon | 2% | 38% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SHAFER Genine | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 1% | 11% | 42% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MAUL Judy L. | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 32 | PREIMESBERGER Elaine | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WEBB Maud | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | DEBERTIN Beth | 21% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | FOLEY Eileen | - | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 19% | |
| 36 | GLUCK Myriam | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 37 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | HILD Ranjani | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | JOHNSON Pamela | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | PEIN Annette | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SCHLIENGER Katia | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 42 | KIM Nam Heui | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 5% | |
| 43 | THORNTON Eva | 4% | 24% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | WALTER Joanne | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | HIRSCH Lauren | 32% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | MARSH Lisa | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | MUNGOVAN Elizabeth | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | CONNOLLY Grace | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 49 | MORO Diana | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.