Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 2 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | GOLDADE Luke A. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 3 | LE Jacob W. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% |
| 5 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% |
| 6 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 7 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 8 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 10 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 11 | MORROW Brenden | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 12 | MA Andrew | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Jacob | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Jett | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | PARK Ryan | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | BLAM Matthew | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | RENTERIA Emiliano | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Liam | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | LI Avery Peihong | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 36% | 5% |
| 21 | BARTSCH Henry | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | OH Jaden | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | KIM Derek A. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 24 | PONS Diego | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | LE Jacob H. | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 27 | RUBIN Max | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZHANG Matthew | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 12% | 56% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | MCCOSH Evin M. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
| 31 | SMITH Grant D. | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 33 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | |
| 34 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LAM Nicolas | 2% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 10% | 42% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | PARK Sky | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 38 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 39 | BAE Eugene | 4% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | MA Bryant | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
| 42 | BORG Matthew | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | PINCHENG Yao | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ADAMS Cedric | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | NAVARRO Kato | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | DALVA Michael | 2% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | KRAUSE Colin | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | SEIGEL Duncan | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | YORK Lucas | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | FLANAGAN Miles | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | DAYAL Vedant | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 54 | CHEN Brian | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | KUO Jayden | 75% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | SHORTER David Alexander | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ELVANDER Ethan | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | BORDIER Timeo | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | YUAN Jonathan | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | DULAI Angad | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.