Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
2 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
3 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
3 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
5 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
6 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
7 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
8 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
9 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
10 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
11 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
12 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
13 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
14 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
15 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
16 | BLAM Matthew | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
17 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
18 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
19 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
20 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 5% |
21 | BARTSCH Henry | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
22 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
23 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
24 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
25 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
26 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
27 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 7% | - |
28 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
29 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 88% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
30 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% | |
31 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 18% | 2% | |
32 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
33 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
34 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
35 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 90% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
37 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | |
38 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
39 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 96% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
40 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
41 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | 2% |
42 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
43 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | ADAMS Cedric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
45 | NAVARRO Kato | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
46 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 98% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
47 | KRAUSE Colin | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
48 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
49 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
50 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
51 | YORK Lucas | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
52 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
53 | DAYAL Vedant | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
54 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
56 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | SHORTER David Alexander | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | ELVANDER Ethan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
58 | BORDIER Timeo | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
60 | YUAN Jonathan | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
61 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.