The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Capitol Clash SYC/RCC

Y-12 Men's Saber

Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 11:00 AM

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, DC, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HUANG Alex F. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.8 6 +0.2
2 CHAMBERS Miles V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 URSU Marcel T. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
3 CARRINGTON IV William T. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
5 OH Aster V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
6 GUREVICH Benjamin V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
7 NG Jonathan V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
8 FENG Brendan V V D V V V V V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
9 CLARK Aram V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
10 LI AYDEN V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
11 SRIVATS Vedh V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
12 LIU Victor V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
13 AO Christopher V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
14 MCDONALD Finn V D V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
15 PINTO Marcus V V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
16 BAI Evan V V V V V D V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
17 BIVIJI Ali V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 DOMINIQUE Remson V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
19 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
20 ANAND Rishab V D V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 NARDINI Nathanael P. V V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
22 SUN Andrew V V V V V D V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
23 NGO Emerson D V V V V V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
24 HUCHWAJDA Alex D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
25 WONG Max V V V V V D V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
26 DAI Zihou V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
27 LUO Leonard V V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
28 ZHANG Kaixuan V D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
29 MORGAN Abrahm H. V V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
30 YOOK Isaac V V V D V D V V D 4.0 4 -
31 HU Jayden V V D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
32 SASSI Ilyas V D D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
33 DOSTAL Maximilian V V V D V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
34 HU Harry V V V D D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
35 LIU Marvin D V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
36 CHEN Lucas V D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
37 LIEBOWITZ Carson V V V V D D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
38 HARDRICK Noah V D V D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
39 AVERY Marcus D V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
40 CLARK Dwayne V V V V D D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
41 BARRY Dave D V D V V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
42 LIU Aaron V V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
43 CHENG Sawyer V D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
44 LAMTAN Christoffer D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
45 LI Yidong A. V D D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
46 YU BOWEN D V D V V D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
47 CAI fungyu V D D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
48 BIVIJI Adam D D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
49 LIN Brendan D V V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 ONG Dylan D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 SONG Nicholas D D V V V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
52 GRABOWSKI Alexander V V D D V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
53 MERMEGAS Alexander D V D D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
54 CHAWLA Abhishek V D D V V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
55 GORDON Samuel D D D V V V D 2.0 2 -
55 LIAO Sirui D D V V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
57 JOHNSON Leland V V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
58 FEI Danny D V D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
59 SAYAR Luke D V D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
60 WONG Hawken V D D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
61 SAGE Nikolai D D V D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
62 ZENG Alfie D V D D V D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
63 TRZEPLA Max V V D D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
64 WU Vincent D V D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
65 HU Andrew D D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 ZHAO Royce D V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 SUH Leo V D V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
68 LEMERY Marc D V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
69 OREN Daniel V V D V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
70 CUSSON William D V V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
71 WEI Rian D D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 SONG Aidan D V V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
73 SLAVNOV Anton V D D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
74 ARVIND Adhijay V V V D D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 MUNOZ Jonas V D V D V D D 0.4 3 +2.6
76 PERRIN Leo D V D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
77 LEE Brendan V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
78 DONNELL Cillian V D V D V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
79 YU Ian V V D V D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
80 BROOKS Drake D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
81 MEHTA Yash D D V V D D 2.0 2 -
82 KAUL Ishaan D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
83 LIU Ethan D D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
84 PAUL James V V D D D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
85 SINGH Ekam D V D D V D D 3.7 2 -1.7
86 YAO Zachary V V D D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
87 YANG Justin D V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
88 MALEK Zak D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
89 FRANCOIS Gabriel D V D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
90 MONELL Frank D D D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
91 LEE Ezra V D D V D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
92 AGARWAAL Yohan V D D D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
93 KOZLOFF Wyatt D D D V V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
94 GUO Jonathan V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
95 LYU Tyler D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
96 SAUVE Quinn D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
97 WAXLER Alex D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 CAREY Sam D D V D D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
99 BUKZIN Alan D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
100 KARAVAS Nicholas D D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
101 BADMUS Joshua D D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
102 CHAVAN Aditya D D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
103 KUMAR Avinash D D V D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
104 SO Morgan D D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
105 GRABOWSKI Stanley D D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
106 JIA Charles V D D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
107 ZHANG Aiden D D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
108 BONGIORNO Wesley D D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
109 REGALADO Hudson D D V D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
110 ABREU ACKER Joaquin D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
111 RINALDI Savio D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
112 GUAN Adam D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
113 PARK Emerson D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
114 SO Dylan D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
115 PROSPER Nathaniel D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
116 PIERPAN James D D D D D D 3.1 0 -3.1
117 YANG LOUIS D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
118 MAHAPATRA Siddhant D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
119 EARLEY Jack D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
119 OTT William D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
121 PIPKE Garrett D D D D D D D 3.3 0 -3.3
122 BRISENO Ethan D D D D D D D 3.2 0 -3.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.