Hugh Mills Physical Education Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BASKIN Miles | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 2 | JAAFAR Hamza | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 3 | HAN Ethan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | CAFFIAUX Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 5 | MALIKOV Zinnun | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 6 | MAXWELL Austin | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 7 | MCFARLAND Kai | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
| 8 | JUNG Elliot | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG Eric | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | MARSHALL Wesley | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 11 | ILENRE Roni | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 12 | PAK Joel | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | CHOI David | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | HONG Ryan | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 15 | MESA Brian C. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 16 | PARK Judy | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | KRIEGER Jack | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 18 | KUMAR Anusha | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ROSS Connor | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | 4% | 32% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
| 21 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | DONGES Anna | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 25 | YANG Maximus | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | |
| 26 | NG Joshua Z. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 27 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 28 | SINGH Siddhant | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | LEE Daehyeon | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 29 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | MANN Justin | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 32 | WANG Zarina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | PULLEN Ayah | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAMBRICK Addison | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | CHUNG Joseph | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 37 | LE Kevin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 38 | DAVIS Kelly | - | - | 3% | 22% | 51% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | NICKERSON Oliver | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ATON Dave | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 41 | HONG Robin | 14% | 47% | 35% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHOI Adam | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | FAN Yuchen | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | ROBERTS Quinton | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | ARZT Nicholas | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 46 | LY Gabriel | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KREISER Alexander | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | JACKSON Viktoria | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JIN Dongwoo | 9% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | YAWN Joshua | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | MACKEVICIUS Nykolas | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 52 | CORDOVA Colin | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | ALVARENGA Darby | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 55 | THOMAS Ethan | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CATES Georgia | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 57 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | CHOI Caister | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | VALDEZ Lorena | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | MCGILLIAN Joseph | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 61 | GHOLSTON Alex | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | HOLLERS Eden | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | RAVITA Henry | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | DAVIS Shanna | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | BASKIN Julia | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.