Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek | V V V V V | V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | LI Chenyu | V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | GUINAN Joseph | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | ROBINSON Matthew | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 5 | MANAUGH Guy | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 6 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | CONKLIN Jim | D V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | WANG David | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | ROBERTS Jonah | V D V V V | V | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 11 | WHEELER Mark C. | V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 12 | GLASS Timothy C. | V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 12 | SILVERS Ari | V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | SHARPSWAIN Tennyson (Tenny) F. | V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 14 | ARNEMANN Jonas | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | RICHARDSON Ray | D V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | LASKA Patryk | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | SONN Rohan | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SWANSON Dave | D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 21 | YUE Xinyi | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | HALLMAN Blake | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 23 | ALI Adam | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 23 | SAMUEL Nirmel | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 25 | SHARPSWAIN Simon | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | MCDOWELL Will | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | PAPP Mike | V V D D D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 | |
| 28 | TIERNEY Luke | V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | DICKSON Tim | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 30 | NGUYEN Maik | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | GREENE Patrick | D D D V D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 32 | BRADFORD Ethan | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | NASSOS Eric | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 34 | WEATHERLY Hugh | D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 35 | HENSEL Kaeleb | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 36 | OM Anthony | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.