Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek | - | - | - | - | 2% | 98% |
| 2 | LI Chenyu | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 3 | GUINAN Joseph | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | ROBINSON Matthew | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | - |
| 5 | MANAUGH Guy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 8 | CONKLIN Jim | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 9 | WANG David | - | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
| 10 | ROBERTS Jonah | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | WHEELER Mark C. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 12 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 12 | SILVERS Ari | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 37% | |
| 14 | SHARPSWAIN Tennyson (Tenny) F. | 1% | 13% | 42% | 37% | 7% | |
| 14 | ARNEMANN Jonas | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 16 | RICHARDSON Ray | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LASKA Patryk | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 18 | SONN Rohan | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 19 | SWANSON Dave | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | |
| 20 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | YUE Xinyi | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 22 | HALLMAN Blake | 1% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ALI Adam | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | SAMUEL Nirmel | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SHARPSWAIN Simon | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 2% |
| 26 | MCDOWELL Will | 5% | 37% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 27 | PAPP Mike | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 28 | TIERNEY Luke | 10% | 49% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | DICKSON Tim | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | - |
| 30 | NGUYEN Maik | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GREENE Patrick | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BRADFORD Ethan | 15% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NASSOS Eric | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | WEATHERLY Hugh | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | HENSEL Kaeleb | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | OM Anthony | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.