Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
2 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
3 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
3 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 8% |
5 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | |
6 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
7 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 24% | |
8 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
9 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | < 1% |
10 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
11 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
12 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 24% |
13 | HUSSAM hussam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
14 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
14 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
16 | SITTER Gregoire | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
18 | LOOK Edward | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
19 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
20 | CHATTHA Amrik | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
21 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
22 | NG Biwon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
23 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
24 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
25 | ASTLE Stephen | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
27 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
28 | KAUR Jaap | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
29 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 93% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
31 | ZGRAGGEN dale | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | SODHI Jaco | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
33 | SWANSON Carl G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
34 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 85% | 37% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 81% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | LOGUE Paul | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - | |
37 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
38 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
39 | COLON Theodore | 100% | 89% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.