Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ELSISSY Ziad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 2 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 3 | BROWN Zackery J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 3 | DEANS Donovan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 5 | WALKER Dalton F. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 7 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 8 | TIAN Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 8% | |
| 9 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 11% |
| 10 | CHAN Zachary D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 11 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 12 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | VACCARI Braden | 100% | 95% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | KARAM Tariq A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 15 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 16 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 18 | GUZMAN Rafael (RJ) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | WANG Qifa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% | |
| 21 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 22 | HAN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 81% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | WOLIN Zachary A. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | LIN John A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
| 25 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 26 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 28 | CHIEN Phillip L. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 29 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 32 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 33 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 35 | SEVOSTYANOV Stepan (Seva) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% | |
| 36 | ODIERNO Payton W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 37 | KURTZFREILICH Jake A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | HUANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 41 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 42 | CACERES Hernan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 43 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 44 | WU Nicholas R. | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | NOLTEMY Daniel J. | 100% | 89% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | KAHN Justin M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 48 | TANG Albert | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HUAYTA James W. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 50 | HALL Justyn | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | LIN William | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | YEN Preston | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 53 | MARSDEN Jack C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% | |
| 53 | LIU Vincent S. | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 57 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 5% | |
| 58 | REYES Kyle | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 60 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 61 | SHAKER Maged | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | MESKILL Adam T. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | RONGET Gaspard | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 67 | DUNN John (Jack) F. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MESHKOV Andrey | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | KARABULUT Burhan | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | KURTZ Christopher S. | 100% | 76% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.