The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 2 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | |
| 3 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 6 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 14% | |
| 7 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 4% |
| 8 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 9 | MU Allison | 100% | 99% | 72% | 29% | 5% | < 1% | |
| 10 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | 2% |
| 11 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | OH Ceana | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 15 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
| 16 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 18 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 11% | |
| 19 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 20 | PENG Serena | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 23 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | BAIXAULI Carme | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | CARVAJAL Sofia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 26 | SUN Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% | 2% | |
| 27 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 28 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 90% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
| 30 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 32 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | SEN Arjen | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 38 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | SANDVIK Clarissa A. | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | XIE Su | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.