ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIN James G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LIU Derek | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | PITERBARG Maxim | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | REZA Farazi | D D V V D D | V V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 5 | ZHAO Adam | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | CHEN Ethan | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | LIU Ryan | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 8 | CHENG Logan | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 9 | LEE Brendan | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | RNO Kyler | V V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 11 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | SUN Ryan | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | MILLER Jordan | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | LYNCH Owen C. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | GLEBA Nico | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | ZENG Rick | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 17 | LEUNG Jin | V V V V V | D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 18 | LI Aaron | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | V V V D V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 20 | UNGERER Roger M. | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 21 | ABRAMSOHN Seth | D V V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 22 | KOVACS Wyatt | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | XU Ethan | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 24 | SURESH Rohan | D D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | NICOLL James | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | MARTIN Darius | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | LI Ayren | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | ARCE Andrew W. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | DALBERG Anders | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | CHEN Hanson | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 32 | YANG Dylan | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | TJON Calum | D V D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 34 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 35 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | JURMAN Therin | V D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | NICOLL William | D V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HARRA Alexander | D V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 39 | BAI Brian | V D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 40 | PERLMAN Taiyo | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 40 | CHENG Ethan | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 42 | LEE Eugene | V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | WILSON Eric | V D D V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 44 | BLEIL Tyler | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | VALENTINE David | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 46 | LORANGER Peter | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 47 | GAO Payton | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 48 | ZHANG Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 49 | TAM Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 49 | MENDEZ Ren | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | LEVIN Jack | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.