ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | WANG Robert | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | BROU Inkosi | D D V D V V | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | DENG Andrew | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 5 | TRUDNOS Allen | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | MARGULIES William | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | MICLAUS Justin | V V V D V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 9 | MORALES Jonathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | WONG Ryan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | TENG MATTHEW | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 13 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 14 | THORNHILL Kwasi | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | HUANG Alex F. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 16 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | CHEN Evan P. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | LEE Aydan J. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 20 | SUGIURA Samuel | V V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 21 | NOBLE Colin | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 22 | KILGALLEN William | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 23 | PANDEY Neil | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 24 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 25 | STAMIS Kyle | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 26 | SAVOY Luca | D V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 27 | GUALTERO Samuel | V D V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 28 | FREDRICK Jameer | D D V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 29 | ZENG Noah | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 30 | WANG Nicolas | D D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | DOWNEY Baran | D D V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 32 | KESSLER Josh | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | DOLAN Charles R. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 34 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 35 | CHENG Hong | V V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 36 | YOO Maxwell | D V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 37 | HAN Daniel Y. | V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 38 | MCCARTHY Devan | D V V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 39 | HOPPA Luke H. | D V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 40 | KASPER Aaron | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 41 | KOGAN Nikita | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 42 | VAROQUA Nalby | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 43 | WEBER Mattias A. | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 44 | PERRON Robert | V V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 45 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 46 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 46 | GONG Jerry | D V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 48 | ENGEL Peter | D V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 49 | ELIN Adam E. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 50 | POSY Daniel | V V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 51 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 52 | PENG Bryan | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 53 | KOVACH Jonah F. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 54 | ZHAO Lucas | D V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 55 | CHUNG Connor | V V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 56 | CHEN Jonathan | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 57 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 58 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 59 | CHOKSI Vihaan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 60 | SLODYCZKA Gabriel | V V D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 61 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | V D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 62 | MATTOO Surya | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 63 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 64 | SMITH Vaughn | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 65 | LAUB William | D V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 66 | WAXLER Seth B. | D V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 67 | LEE Andrew | V D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 67 | TSAO Oliver | V D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 69 | SIMMONS John M. | D D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 70 | DEKA Tanush | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 71 | BODKIN Jake M. | D D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 72 | BHATIA Ekam | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 73 | DEPEW Spencer | D D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 74 | LEONARD Charles | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 75 | MEYERSON Jacob | V D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 76 | TAUER Sam | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 77 | ZHENG LEON | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 78 | DIMATTEO Michael | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 79 | KAUFFMAN James | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 80 | SMINK Oliver | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 81 | RYAN Kai | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 82 | KIM Theodore | D D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 83 | MARGULIS Jared | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 84 | MANESCU Miron | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 84 | OU Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 86 | SEN Christian | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 86 | DESAUTELS Connor | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 88 | LEE Anderson | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 89 | TSAO Alister | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 89 | KEIPER Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 91 | JAVIDI Michael | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 92 | FERTIL Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 93 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 94 | LIGH Checed | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.