ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | WANG Robert | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | BROU Inkosi | D D V D V V | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
3 | DENG Andrew | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
5 | TRUDNOS Allen | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
6 | MARGULIES William | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
7 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
8 | MICLAUS Justin | V V V D V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
9 | MORALES Jonathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
10 | WONG Ryan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
11 | TENG MATTHEW | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
13 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
14 | THORNHILL Kwasi | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | HUANG Alex F. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
16 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
17 | CHEN Evan P. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | LEE Aydan J. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
20 | SUGIURA Samuel | V V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
21 | NOBLE Colin | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
22 | KILGALLEN William | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
23 | PANDEY Neil | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
24 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
25 | STAMIS Kyle | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
26 | SAVOY Luca | D V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
27 | GUALTERO Samuel | V D V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
28 | FREDRICK Jameer | D D V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
29 | ZENG Noah | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
30 | WANG Nicolas | D D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
31 | DOWNEY Baran | D D V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
32 | KESSLER Josh | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
33 | DOLAN Charles R. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
34 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
35 | CHENG Hong | V V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
36 | YOO Maxwell | D V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
37 | HAN Daniel Y. | V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | MCCARTHY Devan | D V V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
39 | HOPPA Luke H. | D V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
40 | KASPER Aaron | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
41 | KOGAN Nikita | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
42 | VAROQUA Nalby | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
43 | WEBER Mattias A. | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
44 | PERRON Robert | V V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
45 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
46 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | GONG Jerry | D V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
48 | ENGEL Peter | D V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
49 | ELIN Adam E. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | POSY Daniel | V V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
51 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
52 | PENG Bryan | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
53 | KOVACH Jonah F. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | ZHAO Lucas | D V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
55 | CHUNG Connor | V V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
56 | CHEN Jonathan | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
57 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
58 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
59 | CHOKSI Vihaan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | SLODYCZKA Gabriel | V V D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
61 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | V D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
62 | MATTOO Surya | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
63 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
64 | SMITH Vaughn | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
65 | LAUB William | D V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
66 | WAXLER Seth B. | D V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
67 | LEE Andrew | V D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
67 | TSAO Oliver | V D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
69 | SIMMONS John M. | D D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
70 | DEKA Tanush | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
71 | BODKIN Jake M. | D D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
72 | BHATIA Ekam | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | DEPEW Spencer | D D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
74 | LEONARD Charles | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
75 | MEYERSON Jacob | V D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
76 | TAUER Sam | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
77 | ZHENG LEON | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
78 | DIMATTEO Michael | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | KAUFFMAN James | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
80 | SMINK Oliver | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
81 | RYAN Kai | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
82 | KIM Theodore | D D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
83 | MARGULIS Jared | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | MANESCU Miron | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
84 | OU Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
86 | SEN Christian | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
86 | DESAUTELS Connor | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
88 | LEE Anderson | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
89 | TSAO Alister | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
89 | KEIPER Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
91 | JAVIDI Michael | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
92 | FERTIL Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
93 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
94 | LIGH Checed | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.