Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Chenqiao | - | - | - | - | 11% | 89% | |
| 2 | LU Kevin | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 3 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 5 | LI Richard | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 6 | BIELER Mason | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 7 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 8 | YANG Charles | - | - | 4% | 26% | 64% | 6% | |
| 9 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHANG Lucas | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Raphael | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 12 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | ZHONG Maxwell | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LI Edison M. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | DENG David | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 16 | ONG Nicholas | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 17 | CHAN Joseph | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 18 | HAYES Stewart | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 19 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 20 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 21 | YOU Alan | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 22 | WANG Tiger | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 23 | NAIR Sujit | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | CHANG Jeremy | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | ZHOU Ryan | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 26 | WANDJI Noah | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 27 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 28 | SISINNI Leonardo | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 29 | KIM Seoheul | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | YANG Tate | 1% | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 32 | WONNEBERG Luke | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 33 | PUSHKIN HUANG Yam | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 34 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Max | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | ROBERTS Nikolai | 3% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | YAN Rian | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HUYNH Matthew | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SU Preston | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | RAU Shogun | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | HO Christopher | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | GUO Joey | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - | - | |
| 43 | SHENOY sean | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Joshua | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | WU Thomas | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | HE Ian | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | JIANG Sean | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | BHUPATHIRAJU Arjun | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | IRELAND Jack | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | SLAIN Owen | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | IYOKI Sean | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | YANG Steve | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 20% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | THOMAS Noah | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 55 | CHEN Andrew | 3% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | GALERO Suther | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | PARK Jayden | 3% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.