Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Chenqiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
| 2 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 52% | 17% |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 5 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 6 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 7 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 8 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 6% | |
| 9 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 12 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | DENG David | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 16 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 17 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 18 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 19 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 21 | YOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 22 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 23 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 25 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 26 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | |
| 27 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
| 28 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | KIM Seoheul | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | YANG Tate | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 32 | WONNEBERG Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 33 | PUSHKIN HUANG Yam | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Max | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | ROBERTS Nikolai | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | YAN Rian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SU Preston | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | HO Christopher | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | GUO Joey | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | - | - | |
| 43 | SHENOY sean | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | WU Thomas | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HE Ian | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | JIANG Sean | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 48 | BHUPATHIRAJU Arjun | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | IRELAND Jack | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 73% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | IYOKI Sean | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | YANG Steve | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 80% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | THOMAS Noah | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 55 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 97% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | GALERO Suther | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.