NKFA - Ludlow, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCNICHOLAS Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 2 | BAMPTON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 33% | 3% | |
| 3 | CORNETT Sawyer Reece | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | CONN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% | |
| 5 | MANAUGH Guy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 6 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 7 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 43% | |
| 8 | WRIGHT Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 9 | AGUILAR Nicolas F. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 10 | HE Matthew | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 11 | DIDAY Griffen | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | |
| 12 | YORK Joseph | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 13 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 14 | MILLER Zach | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | DEMANGONE Reed | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | MANAUGH Calliope | 100% | 87% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | KIM Emily | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | LYU Mengyao | 100% | 95% | 59% | 5% | - | - | |
| 19 | BRISKI Loyd | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SCHNUR Luke | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KING Alice | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 22 | TLUCHOWSKI Sam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | FOREMAN Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | MCCOY Brennan | 100% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | CHARLTON Cecelia | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.