Southwest Recreation Center - Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
2 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
3 | HANDBERG Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 81% | 26% | |
3 | SIMMES Jackson | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | |
5 | CLAYTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% |
6 | ALVIOR Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
7 | IRWIN Peter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 54% | 9% | |
8 | ROMERO KURI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 36% | |
9 | KOSSMANN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 24% | |
10 | FREY Wayne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 39% | |
11 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 37% |
12 | WOLF Christopher | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 16% | - |
13 | CUNNINGHAM. John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 22% | |
14 | MODULLA Yathin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
15 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 35% | |
16 | ALVIOR Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% | |
17 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 8% |
18 | VON ESCHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
19 | LIU Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% | 25% | 2% |
20 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% |
21 | DUARTE-GARCIA Zoya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
22 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 9% | |
23 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 98% | 74% | 8% | - | |
24 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 72% | |
25 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - |
26 | PRICE Jordan | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
27 | MCFARLAND John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 12% |
28 | GROSSE Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 60% | 13% | |
29 | FERNLUND Helen | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
29 | LANGUASCO Michael | 100% | 96% | 64% | 11% | - | |
31 | VENZON Gavin Roy | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - |
32 | RASSEL John | 100% | 96% | 67% | 22% | 2% | - |
33 | BOLLE Elijah | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | |
34 | LE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 3% |
35 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% | |
36 | RILEY Grace | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | |
37 | MCCREARY Madeleine | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | |
38 | HAMER-HODGES Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | |
39 | LIU Nick | 100% | 38% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | FREEMAN Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
41 | FULLERTON Joshua | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
42 | URIBE LEON Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | 2% |
43 | WAGMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 24% | |
44 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
45 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 100% | 98% | 78% | 24% | 2% | |
46 | CARRIE Konnor | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
47 | FORTIER Adriana | 100% | 81% | 14% | - | - | |
48 | DOAN Dylan | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | |
49 | BELL Adam | 100% | 71% | 12% | 1% | - | |
50 | GUADAMUZ Cesar | 100% | 41% | 4% | - | - | |
51 | PEREVORUKHOV Ivan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 1% |
52 | CROSS Phoenix | 100% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
52 | COLLINS Hannah | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
54 | ROZET Alice | 100% | 97% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - |
55 | KURCHIN Ekaterina | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
56 | RODA Thaleia | 100% | 58% | 10% | - | - | |
57 | CULLEN Reilly | 100% | 69% | 7% | - | - | |
58 | MIHALIK Alva | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
59 | KOTHA Maanas | 100% | 85% | 38% | 4% | - | |
60 | AGEE Brendon | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | |
61 | DAVIS Kelly | 100% | 94% | 39% | 6% | - | |
62 | MIA Raj | 100% | 78% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
63 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | WILFORD Madigan | 100% | 46% | 8% | - | - | - |
65 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.