San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | |
| 2 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 21% | |
| 3 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 5 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | |
| 7 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 3% | |
| 8 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
| 9 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 61% | |
| 10 | SEAL Cameron I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
| 13 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 14 | YANG Lea | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 17 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 2% | |
| 18 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 19 | LIU Emily | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | NASIROV Zemfira | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 10% | - | |
| 24 | XA-CHIN Sara | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
| 30 | STONE Coral | 100% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CUI Jinzhu | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | KONG Daniela | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SNOAD Indy | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CAPLICE Ella | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | POIRIER Hailey | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.