San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
2 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% |
3 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
5 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% |
7 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
8 | HERRERA LARA Luisa F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
9 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 25% |
10 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
11 | PENG Florella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
12 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
13 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
14 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
15 | YANG Lea | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
17 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
18 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
19 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
21 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
22 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
23 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% |
24 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% |
25 | TSOI Julie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
26 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
27 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
28 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
29 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
30 | PYO Penelope E. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
31 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
32 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 100% | 86% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | LIN Grace | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
36 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
37 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
38 | LI Chengxuan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | STREU Mirabel | 100% | 85% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
40 | SHAPONA Lillian | 100% | 74% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.