Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% | |
| 2 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 3 | KONG Martin C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% | |
| 3 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 3% | |
| 5 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 6 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 7 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 8 | GETSIN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 9 | COHEN Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 10 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% | |
| 11 | VERA Kalista R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | KUO Michael | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 13 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | NG Biwon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 15 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 16 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 19 | MILLER Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 20 | SITTER Gregoire | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | MORETTI David | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | LI Yunji | 100% | 82% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | MCINTYRE Oberon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | ASTLE Stephen | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | DU Peter | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | DUONG John | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HOROWITZ David S. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MAXIMILIAN Matteo | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | ABECK Eden | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | MILLER Roy E. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.