Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 2 | JIMENEZ Diran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 3 | FIELD Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 5 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% |
| 6 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 7 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 8 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 9 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 10 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 11 | GRIGORIEV Eduard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 12 | PALAZZOLO William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 13 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 14 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
| 16 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | SMITH Liam C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | LEWICKI Max | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 19 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
| 20 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 22 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 6% |
| 23 | SHAFAIE Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
| 24 | KANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 25 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | BLUTT Emerson B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% | |
| 26 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 28 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 29 | CAFARO Ben A. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | PAK Kwan Ting A. | 100% | 97% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | GAUDET Paul D. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 32 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 35 | LIU Kevin B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 36 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 37 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 38 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 40 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 41 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 41 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | RICCIO Frank J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 46 | HU Robin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 47 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 96% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 49 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 51 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 52 | SAMORA Jose G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 53 | KOECK Tomas E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 54 | AHN Jun | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 56 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 58 | WEI William | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | HILMER Michael | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | LOUIE Timothy J. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 61 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 64 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 65 | FRERE-CAROSSIO Quentin | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 66 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 67 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 69 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 70 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | EIG Ethan A. | 100% | 71% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 74 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 76 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 77 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 78 | FU Yifan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | KAZA Nitish | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 80 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 81 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 82 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | QI Steve | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | SCHALES Peyton | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | VENKATESH Aditya | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.