William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SEMP Iain | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 47% | 6% |
2 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
3 | HSIEH Rebecca | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
5 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
6 | REEDER Nicholas W. | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
7 | FERGUSON Sam C. | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
8 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 19% | 2% |
9 | PRICE Owen | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
10 | HARPER Wesley | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
11 | SOPHRONIUS Jeddie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
12 | SHMUKLER Maria | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
13 | KASPER Lucia | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - |
14 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | |
15 | HAYES Nathan P. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
16 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
17 | POOLE Katherine | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
18 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | JHA Ritika | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
20 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | ZIMSKY James | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
23 | HARTMAN Grayson | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
24 | LAMBERT Luke | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | BURNSIDE Caden | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | DUCK Parker | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | JOHNSON Alex | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
28 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
29 | CRAIG Morgan | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
30 | EDELMAN Catherine | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
31 | CHERRY Samuel | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
31 | BRUTON Vinton | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
33 | BAILEY Linwood | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
34 | MUSS Josephine | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.