The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HEDGES Philip S. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% | |
| 2 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 3 | WINTZ Paul K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | MING Nathan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 5 | SUORSA Markus | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 6 | AHMED Saheer | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 32% | 2% | |
| 7 | COHEN Benjamin A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 8 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 9 | MADRID Maureen | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
| 10 | WATT Darren | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 11 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | 1% | 8% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 1% | |
| 12 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | WANG Xu-Chen | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | QUIROGA Kyle | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | LI Yunji | 5% | 42% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | KOERBER Christopher T. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 17 | CHENG Zijun | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
| 19 | NIKIFOROV Timofei | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 20 | LIPTON Michael D. | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | - | |
| 20 | XU Yanwen | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 22 | NGUYEN Peyton | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | - | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Helen | 16% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 25 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | SHARMA Ananya | 18% | 54% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.