Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHANG Andrea | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 2 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | LIN Joyce | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | SHI Haoqing | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 5 | DU Hannah | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
| 6 | WU Irene M. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 32% |
| 7 | RASO Olivia | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 9 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | LI Meilin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 11 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 12 | LEE Ariana | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 13 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 14 | PAVE Claire | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 17 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 18 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | LEE Angelina S. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
| 20 | SU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 21 | XIANG Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | GU Emily | - | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 23 | MUZZI Jessica | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 24 | BHAN Zala | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | ROHRING Anna L. | 5% | 30% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | CHEN Georgia M. | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 28 | CLOWES Madison | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | WAIBEL Jenna | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CHARALEL Jessica | 6% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | PARK Caitlyn | 18% | 50% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | KROMMENHOEK Noel A. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | PAN Anna | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | MORO Diana | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PARK Jacqueline | 11% | 45% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | TAI Serena | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | OETZEL Taylor | 17% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | GINDE Maithili | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.