Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
2 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
3 | LIN Joyce | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
3 | SHI Haoqing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
5 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
6 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
7 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
8 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% |
9 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
10 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
11 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
12 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
13 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
14 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
15 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
16 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
17 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% |
18 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
19 | LEE Angelina S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
20 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% |
21 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
22 | GU Emily | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
23 | MUZZI Jessica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
24 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
25 | ROHRING Anna L. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
26 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
27 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% |
28 | CLOWES Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
29 | WAIBEL Jenna | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
30 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
31 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 82% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
32 | KROMMENHOEK Noel A. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
34 | PAN Anna | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
35 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
36 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
38 | MORO Diana | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 89% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | TAI Serena | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
41 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
42 | GINDE Maithili | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.