Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Chenqiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 42% |
| 2 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 5 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 6 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 7 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 8 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 9 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 10 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 11 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 12 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
| 13 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 14 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 6% |
| 16 | LEE Jaehee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 17 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% | |
| 18 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% |
| 20 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 21 | SHAW eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 23 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 23 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 25 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 26 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 27 | YOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 28 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 29 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ALANAZI Saif | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | DANTON Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 5% |
| 34 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 18% |
| 35 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 37 | YANG Steve | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
| 38 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 39 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | CHEN Ryker | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 40 | RAMKUMAR Eeshan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 42 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 43 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | WATERFIELD Lysander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 45 | KO Darren | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | HE Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 47 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YANG Tate | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 49 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | KIM Gene | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 52 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | WU Wallace | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 54 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 55 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | YAN Rian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 58 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 59 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | YE Jerry | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 61 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 62 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HUA Isaac | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 67 | WU Gengze | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | JIN Xueyuan George | 100% | 99% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 69 | SUAREZ Lucas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 70 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | VALENCIA Beryn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | LIN George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 73 | BERCEN Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 74 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 75 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 76 | LI Jayden | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | LU Baisu | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 79 | WU James | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | HOARE Gabriel | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | TEOH Liam | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 84 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 85 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | FUNG Tiberias | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 86 | PARK Avan | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 89 | MO Andy | 100% | 72% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | MARTIRE Francis | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ZHONG Albert | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | GOVSHTEYN Ari | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | MO Shawn | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | LI Alexander | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.