The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

March NAC and Parafencing National Championships

Y-12 Men's Saber

Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Fort Worth, TX, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HWANG Jayden V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 6 +0.8
2 NG Jonathan V V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
3 HUANG Alex F. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.9 6 +0.1
3 GUREVICH Benjamin V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
5 LI Howard V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
6 YANG Phillip V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
7 ANAND Rishab V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
8 LI AYDEN V V D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
9 CHAMBERS Miles V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
10 CARRINGTON IV William T. V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
11 CLARK Aram V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 RONG Jasper V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
13 KOVALEV Daniil N. V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
13 LI linze V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
15 XIAO Brayden V V D V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
16 SUN Andrew D V D D V V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
17 MEDVINSKY Daniel V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
18 CAO Donald V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
19 IYER Neil D V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 ANDRES Michael D V V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
21 MCDONALD Finn V V V V V D V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
22 NARDINI Nathanael P. V V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
23 PINTO Marcus V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
24 LIU Victor V V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
25 ARISTOV Ilya V V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
26 SALMAN Hamzah D V D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
27 KITSON Chase D V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
28 KANG Jeremy V D D V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
29 WANG Edward V V D V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
30 SRIVATS Vedh D D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
31 AO Christopher V V V D D D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
32 ZHAO Royce D V D D V V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
33 TSE Aiden J V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
34 URSU Marcel T. V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
35 WEI Rian V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
36 LI Yidong A. V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
37 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) V V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
38 ONG Dylan V V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
39 BAI Evan D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
40 LEE Brady V V D V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
41 HU Harry V V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
42 LOO Jason D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
43 KHANNA Adamantis D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
44 MEADE Liam R. V D V V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
45 WANG Tiger V D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
46 HARDRICK Noah V D D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
47 OH Aster V V V D V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
48 GREENSTEIN Viktor V V D D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
49 LIU Ryan V D V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
50 CHEN Cooper D D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
51 TANG Morgan V V D V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
52 YOOK Isaac D V V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
53 ANUMULA Aryan D D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
54 LIU Marvin V V D V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
55 KAYDALIN David V V V V D D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
56 KIM Yusung V V V V D D V D 1.8 4 +2.2
57 KROON Landon D V V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
58 HWANG Hagan D V V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
59 SOROKIN Egor V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
60 BARENBOYM Michael D V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
61 BIVIJI Ali D V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
62 LIU Aaron V V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
63 TANI Tino V V D D V D V D 4.9 3 -1.9
64 SONG Aidan V V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
65 XU Yixiao V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
66 CHAN Henry D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
67 LUO Leonard D V V V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
68 HAO Johnny V V V V D D D 3.9 4 +0.1
69 CHI Everett V V D D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
70 WANG Alex D V V V V D D 2.4 4 +1.6
71 ZHANG Kaixuan V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
72 KOVACHEV Martin V V D V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
73 NAFTALI Ori V V V D D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
74 WONG Max V D V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
75 CHEN Jack D V V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
76 ROBINSON Ezra V D D V V D 0.9 3 +2.1
77 YU BOWEN D D D V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
78 KUSHKOV Michael V D D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
78 KANG Matthew D V V D V D D 4.7 3 -1.7
80 GU Andrew V V D V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
81 FENG Brendan D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
82 LIU Yijin V D D V V D D 3.0 3 -
83 BIVIJI Adam D D V V V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
84 WONG Hawken D D V V V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
85 CHEN Boaz D D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
86 OU Rigel D V V D V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
87 LIEBOWITZ Carson D V V D V D V D 3.0 3 -
88 KUMAR Avinash V D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
89 GORDON Samuel V D D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
90 SASSI Ilyas V V D D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
91 MERMEGAS Alexander D V V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
92 CHENG Sawyer V D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
93 NAMBIAR Navin D V V D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
94 SHAPIRO Simon D D D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
95 AGARWAAL Yohan V D V V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
96 TAYCHER Aaron D V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
97 LEE Brendan V V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
98 HUO Ethan V D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
99 DAI Zihou D V D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
100 LI Philip D V V D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
101 BOSITA Brennan V V D D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
102 BHANDARE Niev D V D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
103 LAMTAN Christoffer V D D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
104 BRUM Charles E. V D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
105 MAGITSKY Isaac V D V D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
106 WONG Ron V V D D D D V D 2.0 2 -
107 KAUL Ishaan V D D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
108 BOLLU Viren D V D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
109 GUAN Adam V D D V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
110 HU Jayden D D D D V V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
111 ZHANG KAIQI D D V D V D V D 2.0 2 -
112 KOZLOFF Wyatt D V D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
113 LI Ryan D V D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
114 HAN Kyle V D V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
115 LIANG Preston V D V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
116 LIU Ethan D D V D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
117 YUEN Caleb D V V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
118 PAUL James V D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
119 NGO Emerson D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
120 YU Ian D V D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
121 CHEN Xing Ji D D D D D V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
122 LI Huangziyue D D D D V D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
123 LIN Alex D V D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
124 SIMS Elliot V D D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
125 SLAVNOV Anton D D D D D D V D 2.0 0 -2.0
125 BADMUS Joshua D D D D D D V D 1.5 0 -1.5
127 YANG Justin D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
127 CAI fungyu D D D D D D V D 2.6 0 -2.6
129 MHLEY Gavin D D D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
130 SONG Nicholas V D D V D V 1.4 3 +1.6
131 WANG Brian D D V V V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
131 KOHLER Vaughn D D V D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
133 FU BRANDEN V V D D D D D 2.0 2 -
134 YANG LOUIS V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
134 WANG Luke D D V D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
136 ZHU Alexander D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
137 KANIA Alexander D D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
138 MIAO Heqi D D V V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
139 AVERY Marcus V D V D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
140 MINASIAN Mason V D D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
141 ROH Jaden V D D V D D D 1.1 2 +0.9
142 ZHAO Aidan D V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
143 KANG Alan V D D D D V D 0.7 2 +1.3
144 YAO Zachary D D D D V D 0.5 1 +0.5
145 SO Morgan D D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
146 D'AMELJ Edoardo D D D V D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
147 WOSTER Matthew (Mateo) D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
148 LIU Guanyu D D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
149 HOLMES Xavier D V D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
150 DIXON Allan D D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
151 LUC Cedric D D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
152 THOTAKURA Sreyas D D V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
153 LO Lei D D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
154 ARVIND Adhijay D D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
155 LYU Tyler D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
156 LEE Bill King D D V D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
157 MAI Ryan D D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
158 PARK Emerson D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
159 VENKATRAMAN Sushil D V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
160 GUO Jonathan D D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
161 CHAVAN Aditya D D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
162 HE Zhikai (kyle) D D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
163 SHINCHUK Jacob D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
163 LUCAS William D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
165 CROOKS Andrew D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
166 SO Dylan D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
166 GRIGORYAN Sevak D D D D D D D 3.0 0 -3.0
168 ZHANG Aiden D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
168 MALEK Zak D D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
168 QI Jeremy D D D D D D D 2.7 0 -2.7
171 ZHANG Eric D D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
172 WU Yue D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.