Sports Events Recreation Center - The SERC - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | LIN Zhi tong | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 3 | YANG Emma | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 5 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 6 | WANG Amabel | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 7 | WANG SIQI | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
| 8 | HU Felice | - | - | - | 7% | 62% | 31% | |
| 9 | YAO Ada | - | - | - | 1% | 36% | 62% | |
| 10 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 11 | YU Jane | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 12 | SHENG Katherine | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 1% |
| 13 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 14 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 15 | LI Eleanor | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 53% | 15% |
| 16 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 17 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
| 18 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 19 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 20 | FENG Audrey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 21 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | - | 6% | 27% | 47% | 18% | 1% |
| 22 | BING Charlotte | 1% | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 24 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 1% |
| 25 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 27 | CAI Ilana | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | ORRINGER Lottie | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | LI Yixin Catherine | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | CHIANG Mila | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | YU Eliza | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BURGESS Logan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DONG Angela | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | SHI Sasha | 25% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | WANG Selina | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | EYER Brooke | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | HANNAH Abigail | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | BAULIN Zoya | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - | - | |
| 41 | LIN Yunong | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SRIKANTH Shreya | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | |
| 43 | XIE Ling | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 1% |
| 44 | JIANG Chloe | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ZHANG Zoey | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LI Savannah | 14% | 54% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | TAN Dorathy | 2% | 19% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | LI Beryl | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | CAVANAGH Emma | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | GE Lena Lan | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 2% | 14% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 52 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | YOO Shia | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 7% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 66% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KONG Genevieve | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | PAN Yiran | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DU Siqi | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 59 | CHOI Suha | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.