Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
| 3 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 5 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 23% |
| 6 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 7 | POWERS Meredith R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 8 | KELLY Katherine E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | LEVI Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 10 | PO Edith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 11 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% |
| 14 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 15 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | SAXENA Sejal | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 17 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 18 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 19 | JONES LONGENBACH Melanie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 20 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | BECKER Elena | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 22% |
| 24 | WILSON Anna S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 25 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 26 | CHO Lorin Y. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | SUTHERLAND Michelle J. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 95% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Montana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | LEE Alyssa W. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YEUNG Yulia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | ADLER Alexandra | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | ZAVALA-ARBELAEZ Ivanna | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | NITTI Rebecca | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ROCCA Mary J. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | GILHULEY Catie | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | CLEVENGER Estella | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SILVER Anna | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 100% | 94% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | SLOAN Emma F. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.