SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Ashley | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
2 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
3 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
3 | SCOTT Eve | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
5 | SPRINGER Ella | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 42% | 7% |
6 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
7 | SHI Julia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 29% | 3% |
8 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
9 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% | |
10 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% | |
11 | FAN Grace | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
12 | KANDADAI Lara | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
13 | GUVEN Coco | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
14 | BUSH Bethany | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
15 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
16 | YOUNG Audrey | 1% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
18 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
19 | ZENG Sarah | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
20 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
21 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
22 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
23 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
24 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
25 | LIU Moran | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
26 | FEIG Sela | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
27 | REN Xinling | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | NAYAK Esha | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
29 | BAWA Anahat | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
30 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
31 | TENG EMMA | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
32 | WANG yining | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
33 | YEN Natalie | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
34 | MCGRAW Sadie | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | NAYAK Anika | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
36 | WOTZAK Kaia | 5% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
37 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
38 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
39 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
40 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
41 | ZHAN Sophie | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
42 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 1% | 14% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | CONNOLLY Vida | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - |
44 | LI Alexis | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
45 | FLATT Sophia | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
46 | MANKOVA Varvara | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
47 | ZHENG Sophia | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
48 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
49 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
50 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 17% | 53% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | TU Sadie | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
52 | KHOST Maeve | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
53 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
54 | HU Anna | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
54 | NAYAK Antara | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
56 | MORGAN Lily | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
57 | DUBE Naomi | 49% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | KHERA Anya | 64% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
58 | MAROSFOI Virag | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.